Chow Chow or Labradoodle? On paper they differ most on exercise need, and on the scales Chow Chow is the heavier at 45–70 lbs. Here is how the two compare on everything that shapes an ordinary week.
This is for someone already down to Chow Chow and Labradoodle and deciding between them. For this pair the decision usually turns on exercise need and energy level, so those are covered first and in most detail. Anyone choosing from a flat has a clear answer here: Chow Chow rates 4/5 against 2/5. There is no origin story here — only what changes about your week.
Between Chow Chow and Labradoodle, exercise need is what separates them, and Chow Chow is the lower-effort dog of the two to keep.
Choose Chow Chow if you are in a flat or a smaller home, your walking routine is modest and the dog will be alone during the working day.
Choose Labradoodle if this is your first dog, you do not want a standing grooming appointment and shedding is a problem in your house.
| Feature | chow chow | labradoodle | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size class | medium | medium | Equal |
| Weight | 45–70 lbs | 15–65 lbs | Equal |
| Height | 17–20 in | 14–24 in | Equal |
| Lifespan | 9–15 years | 12–14 years | labradoodle |
| Exercise need | Low (2/5) | Very high (5/5) | chow chow |
| Grooming need | Very high (5/5) | High (4/5) | labradoodle |
| Shedding | High (4/5) | Low (2/5) | labradoodle |
| Energy level | Low (2/5) | Very high (5/5) | Equal |
| Barking | Moderate (3/5) | Low (2/5) | labradoodle |
| Apartment suitability | High (4/5) | Low (2/5) | chow chow |
| Good for first-time owners | Low (2/5) | High (4/5) | labradoodle |
| Tolerates being alone | Moderate (3/5) | Low (2/5) | chow chow |
| Trainability | Low (2/5) | Very high (5/5) | labradoodle |
| Good with kids | Moderate (3/5) | Very high (5/5) | labradoodle |
| Good with other dogs | Low (2/5) | High (4/5) | labradoodle |
| Friendly to strangers | Low (2/5) | High (4/5) | labradoodle |
| Cost level | High (4/5) | High (4/5) | Equal |
| Coat | Thick double coat | Wavy to curly | Equal |
| Origin | China | Australia | Equal |
| Typical monthly cost | $120–$250 | $120–$220 | Equal |
| Typical first-year cost | $1,600–$3,000 | $1,800–$3,200 | Equal |
The Labradoodle's weight range is unusually wide - 15 to 65 pounds, depending on whether you land a mini or standard cross - so it can end up smaller or considerably larger than a Chow Chow's steadier 45-70 pound frame. Height overlaps too, 14-24 inches against the Chow's 17-20. If size predictability matters to you, know upfront that "Labradoodle" covers more ground than "Chow Chow" does.
This pairing has one of the starkest exercise gaps in the breed set: Labradoodle rated very high (5/5) for exercise need, Chow Chow rated low (2/5). A Labradoodle bred from working retriever lines wants real daily activity; a Chow is genuinely fine with a short walk and a nap. Match this to your actual routine, not your aspirational one.
Both coats demand upkeep - Chow at very high (5/5), Labradoodle at high (4/5) - but shedding splits sharply: high (4/5) for the Chow's double coat, low (2/5) for the Labradoodle's wavy-to-curly coat. That's part of why Labradoodles get marketed toward allergy-conscious households, though grooming time itself isn't actually lower.
The Chow scores high (4/5) for apartment suitability against the Labradoodle's low (2/5), and while barking tilts toward the Labradoodle being quieter (2/5 vs 3/5), the exercise mismatch matters more indoors - a high-energy dog rated 2/5 for apartment life in a small unit tends to get restless fast, whatever its barking habits.
The Labradoodle rates very high (5/5) on trainability and high (4/5) for first-time owners; the Chow sits at low (2/5) on both. This is a large practical gap - a Labradoodle's energetic, friendly temperament tends to cooperate with training, while the Chow's independent, reserved nature means slower, more deliberate work even for an experienced handler.
With kids, other dogs, and strangers, the Labradoodle rates high to very high across the board (5/5, 4/5, 4/5) while the Chow sits at moderate or low (3/5, 2/5, 2/5) on the same measures. A busy household with kids' friends coming and going, or another dog already in the house, tilts clearly toward the Labradoodle on this data.
The Chow edges out the Labradoodle on lifespan - 9 to 15 years versus 12 to 14 - with more range at the top end. The two share hip dysplasia, elbow dysplasia and bloat risk. Beyond that they diverge: the Labradoodle's list adds progressive retinal atrophy, exercise-induced collapse and epilepsy, while the Chow's adds entropion, glaucoma, diabetes and stomach cancer.
Monthly costs land close together - $120-$250 for the Chow, $120-$220 for the Labradoodle - both in the high (4/5) cost tier. First-year costs actually favor the Chow slightly on the low end ($1,600-$3,000 vs $1,800-$3,200), though a Labradoodle's grooming appointments can add up depending on coat type.
Chow Chow weighs 45–70 lbs and lives 9–15 years; Labradoodle weighs 15–65 lbs and lives 12–14 years. The two diverge most on exercise need, energy level and trainability and 6 other rated axes. Almost every rated axis separates them at least slightly. Where the table declares a winner it means less work for the owner, nothing more; descriptive rows are left as ties on purpose. The value here is in the differences between the two columns; treat any single score as approximate.
Not exactly - the breed's weight range runs 15 to 65 lbs, wider than the Chow Chow's 45-70 lb range, so an individual Labradoodle can land smaller or larger than a Chow.
The Labradoodle, rated very high (5/5), against the Chow's low (2/5) - one of the largest exercise gaps in any comparison on this site.
The Labradoodle, rated very high (5/5) versus the Chow's low (2/5). It's also rated high (4/5) for first-time owners, where the Chow rates low (2/5).
No - the Chow rates high (4/5) for shedding, the Labradoodle low (2/5), despite both requiring substantial grooming time.
Hip dysplasia, elbow dysplasia and bloat appear on both lists. Beyond that, the Labradoodle's risks lean toward PRA and epilepsy, the Chow's toward eye conditions and diabetes.
Nearly identical - $120-$250 for the Chow, $120-$220 for the Labradoodle. Both sit in the high cost tier.
The Labradoodle, clearly - very high (5/5) with kids and high (4/5) with other dogs, versus moderate (3/5) and low (2/5) for the Chow.
The Labradoodle, for most households - it trains more easily, fits better with kids and other dogs, and adapts well to first-time owners. The Chow is the pick only if you specifically want a lower-energy, more independent dog and can handle its harder training curve.
Very close either way - $120-$250 for the Chow, $120-$220 for the Labradoodle. Cost isn't the deciding factor in this matchup.
A big gap - Labradoodle very high (5/5), Chow low (2/5). This is the number that should drive your decision more than any other in this comparison.
The Chow Chow, typically 9-15 years versus 12-14 for the Labradoodle - though the Chow's range also dips lower at the bottom end.
Health information here is general and is not veterinary advice. If your dog shows pain, sudden behaviour change, or worsening symptoms, consult a licensed veterinarian.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you, and we only suggest products we believe are helpful for dog owners.
Match your lifestyle to the right dog.
Take quizNot sure which breed is right for you? Take our 2-minute quiz to find out.
Take the quiz