Bloodhound or Labradoodle?
The Labradoodle is the more forgiving choice for most households - higher trainability, better with kids, longer lifespan - while the Bloodhound suits owners who specifically want its tracking instinct and calmer pace.
Bloodhound or Labradoodle? On paper they differ most on trainability, and on the scales Bloodhound is the heavier at 90–110 lbs. Here is how the two compare on everything that shapes an ordinary week.


This is for someone already down to Bloodhound and Labradoodle and deciding between them. For this pair the decision usually turns on trainability and exercise need, so those are covered first and in most detail. Both rate 2/5 for flats, so housing does not settle this one. It is written for the decision rather than the breed history.
Between Bloodhound and Labradoodle, trainability is what separates them, and Bloodhound is the lower-effort dog of the two to keep.
Choose Bloodhound if you do not want a standing grooming appointment and your walking routine is modest.
Choose Labradoodle if this is your first dog, shedding is a problem in your house and there are young children at home.
| Feature | bloodhound | labradoodle | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size class | large | medium | Equal |
| Weight | 90–110 lbs | 15–65 lbs | Equal |
| Height | 23–27 in | 14–24 in | Equal |
| Lifespan | 7–10 years | 12–14 years | labradoodle |
| Exercise need | Moderate (3/5) | Very high (5/5) | bloodhound |
| Grooming need | Low (2/5) | High (4/5) | bloodhound |
| Shedding | Moderate (3/5) | Low (2/5) | labradoodle |
| Energy level | Moderate (3/5) | Very high (5/5) | Equal |
| Barking | Moderate (3/5) | Low (2/5) | labradoodle |
| Apartment suitability | Low (2/5) | Low (2/5) | Equal |
| Good for first-time owners | Low (2/5) | High (4/5) | labradoodle |
| Tolerates being alone | Low (2/5) | Low (2/5) | Equal |
| Trainability | Low (2/5) | Very high (5/5) | labradoodle |
| Good with kids | High (4/5) | Very high (5/5) | labradoodle |
| Good with other dogs | High (4/5) | High (4/5) | Equal |
| Friendly to strangers | High (4/5) | High (4/5) | Equal |
| Cost level | Moderate (3/5) | High (4/5) | bloodhound |
| Coat | Short, dense | Wavy to curly | Equal |
| Origin | Belgium | Australia | Equal |
| Typical monthly cost | $100–$200 | $120–$220 | Equal |
| Typical first-year cost | $1,500–$2,800 | $1,800–$3,200 | Equal |
The Labradoodle's size range is broad - 15 to 65 lbs and 14 to 24 inches - reflecting the mix of standard and miniature lines bred into it. Even at the top of that range, it stays lighter than the Bloodhound's 90-110 lbs, and shorter too. If you want predictable size, neither breed is perfectly consistent, but the Bloodhound at least stays within a tighter, if heavier, band.
Exercise need and energy level both max out for the Labradoodle at 5/5, well above the Bloodhound's steady 3/5 on each. Labradoodles inherit Labrador retrieving drive and poodle athleticism in equal measure, and they need a real outlet for it daily. The Bloodhound's moderate needs are less demanding but still not nothing - this isn't a low-energy dog, just a lower-energy one by comparison.
Shedding favors the Bloodhound only slightly - 3/5 versus the Labradoodle's 2/5 - but grooming demand flips hard the other way: 4/5 for the Labradoodle against the Bloodhound's easy 2/5. That curly-to-wavy coat needs regular brushing and professional grooming to avoid matting, so the lower shedding doesn't translate into less hands-on maintenance overall. Budget for grooming appointments if the low-shed coat is the main draw.
Both breeds tie at a low 2/5 for apartment suitability, so size alone doesn't solve the space problem for the Labradoodle despite its smaller average build. It does bark less, though - 2/5 versus the Bloodhound's 3/5 - which matters more than square footage in some buildings. Both tolerate being alone poorly, at 2/5 each; neither dog is a good match for an owner gone ten hours a day.
Trainability heavily favors the Labradoodle, 5/5 against the Bloodhound's 2/5, and first-time-owner suitability follows a similar pattern - 4/5 versus 2/5. A Labradoodle responds well to consistent reward-based training; a Bloodhound's nose-driven independence makes even basic obedience a longer project, one better suited to an owner who's trained a strong-willed dog before. That gap alone probably decides this comparison for most new owners.
With kids, the Labradoodle rates 5/5 against the Bloodhound's 4/5, and it ties with the Bloodhound with other dogs at 4/5 each. Both greet strangers warmly at 4/5. This is a comparison where the Labradoodle wins by degree rather than by a wide margin in the household categories, and either dog should integrate reasonably into a busy, social household.
Lifespan favors the Labradoodle by up to seven years - 12 to 14 versus the Bloodhound's 7 to 10. Shared risks include hip dysplasia, elbow dysplasia, bloat and ear infections. The Bloodhound's additional risks are eye problems, atopy, gastric issues, bleeding disorders, ectropion and entropion; the Labradoodle's list adds progressive retinal atrophy, allergies, exercise-induced collapse, joint issues and epilepsy. Joint health is worth watching in the Labradoodle given both hip and elbow dysplasia risk plus general joint issues on its list.
The Labradoodle costs more to keep on every measure: a 4/5 cost rating versus the Bloodhound's 3/5, $120-220 monthly against $100-200, and $1,800-3,200 in the first year compared to $1,500-2,800. Grooming is likely the biggest driver of that gap, given the coat's upkeep demands. Factor recurring grooming visits into your monthly budget rather than treating them as an occasional expense.
Bloodhound weighs 90–110 lbs and lives 7–10 years; Labradoodle weighs 15–65 lbs and lives 12–14 years. The two diverge most on trainability, exercise need and grooming need and 2 other rated axes. They are level on tolerates being alone, apartment suitability and good with other dogs, so those cannot decide it. In the table, a "winner" means easier for an ordinary household — not better. Size, coat and origin are recorded without a verdict. Because both breeds are scored the same way, the gaps are reliable even where the absolute numbers are rough.
Smaller, though variable - 15-65 lbs depending on the line, versus the Bloodhound's consistent 90-110 lbs. Even a large standard Labradoodle typically stays under the Bloodhound's weight.
The Labradoodle, rated 2/5 versus the Bloodhound's 3/5 - but it needs more grooming overall, 4/5 versus 2/5, to keep that coat from matting.
The Labradoodle, with a 4/5 first-time-owner score and 5/5 trainability against the Bloodhound's 2/5 on both counts.
Both tie at a low 2/5 for apartment suitability, though the Labradoodle barks less (2/5 versus 3/5), which can matter more than space in shared buildings.
The Labradoodle runs higher - $120-220 monthly versus $100-200 for the Bloodhound, and up to $3,200 in year one versus $2,800.
On the basics, yes - hip dysplasia, elbow dysplasia, bloat and ear infections appear on both lists, though the Labradoodle's extends to allergies and exercise-induced collapse.
The Labradoodle, typically by several years - 12-14 years versus the Bloodhound's 7-10.
The Labradoodle is the more forgiving choice for most households - higher trainability, better with kids, longer lifespan - while the Bloodhound suits owners who specifically want its tracking instinct and calmer pace.
$100-200 for the Bloodhound, $120-220 for the Labradoodle.
The Labradoodle needs considerably more - 5/5 versus the Bloodhound's 3/5.
12-14 years for the Labradoodle versus 7-10 for the Bloodhound.






Health information here is general and is not veterinary advice. If your dog shows pain, sudden behaviour change, or worsening symptoms, consult a licensed veterinarian.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you, and we only suggest products we believe are helpful for dog owners.
Match your lifestyle to the right dog.
Take quizNot sure which breed is right for you? Take our 2-minute quiz to find out.
Take the quiz