Which breed fits an active household better?
The Vizsla, if you can meet its 5/5 exercise need - it's more trainable and lower-maintenance on grooming, but demands far more daily activity than the Bloodhound.
Bloodhound or Vizsla? On paper they differ most on trainability, and on the scales Bloodhound is the heavier at 90–110 lbs. Here is how the two compare on everything that shapes an ordinary week.


This is for someone already down to Bloodhound and Vizsla and deciding between them. For this pair the decision usually turns on trainability and exercise need, so those are covered first and in most detail. Anyone choosing from a flat has a clear answer here: Bloodhound rates 2/5 against 1/5. Breed history is left out; what follows is what you will actually live with.
Between Bloodhound and Vizsla, trainability is what separates them, and Bloodhound is the lower-effort dog of the two to keep.
Choose Bloodhound if your walking routine is modest.
Choose Vizsla if you do not want a standing grooming appointment, shedding is a problem in your house and there are young children at home.
| Feature | bloodhound | vizsla | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size class | large | medium | Equal |
| Weight | 90–110 lbs | 45–65 lbs | Equal |
| Height | 23–27 in | 21–24 in | Equal |
| Lifespan | 7–10 years | 10–14 years | vizsla |
| Exercise need | Moderate (3/5) | Very high (5/5) | bloodhound |
| Grooming need | Low (2/5) | Very low (1/5) | vizsla |
| Shedding | Moderate (3/5) | Low (2/5) | vizsla |
| Energy level | Moderate (3/5) | Very high (5/5) | Equal |
| Barking | Moderate (3/5) | Low (2/5) | vizsla |
| Apartment suitability | Low (2/5) | Very low (1/5) | bloodhound |
| Good for first-time owners | Low (2/5) | Low (2/5) | Equal |
| Tolerates being alone | Low (2/5) | Very low (1/5) | bloodhound |
| Trainability | Low (2/5) | Very high (5/5) | vizsla |
| Good with kids | High (4/5) | Very high (5/5) | vizsla |
| Good with other dogs | High (4/5) | High (4/5) | Equal |
| Friendly to strangers | High (4/5) | Moderate (3/5) | bloodhound |
| Cost level | Moderate (3/5) | Moderate (3/5) | Equal |
| Coat | Short, dense | Short, dense, rust-colored | Equal |
| Origin | Belgium | Hungary | Equal |
| Typical monthly cost | $100–$200 | $100–$200 | Equal |
| Typical first-year cost | $1,500–$2,800 | $1,500–$2,800 | Equal |
The Vizsla is a medium breed at 45-65 lbs and 21-24 inches, noticeably lighter than the Bloodhound's 90-110 lbs though not all that much shorter - the height gap is only a couple of inches even as the weight gap is substantial. You're looking at a leaner, more athletic build against the Bloodhound's heavier frame.
The Vizsla is one of the higher-energy breeds in this comparison set, rating a maximum 5/5 on exercise need against the Bloodhound's 3/5. Bred as an all-day hunting companion, it wants sustained activity, not a short walk around the block - a genuinely demanding breed for anyone without an active lifestyle.
The Vizsla is remarkably low-maintenance on coat care - a very low 1/5 on grooming and 2/5 on shedding, both better than the Bloodhound's 2/5 and 3/5. Its short, sleek coat needs little beyond an occasional wipe-down, which makes it one of the easiest breeds here to keep clean.
Neither breed suits small spaces, but the Vizsla is worse off - 1/5 on apartment suitability against the Bloodhound's 2/5, and it tolerates being alone less well too, rated 1/5 versus 2/5. It's also notably quieter, at 2/5 on barking against the Bloodhound's 3/5 - a Vizsla left alone is more likely to develop separation anxiety than to bark the house down.
The Vizsla is dramatically more trainable, rating a maximum 5/5 against the Bloodhound's 2/5 - it's an eager, biddable hunting breed built to work closely with a handler. Both rate low, at 2/5, for first-time-owner suitability overall, since the Vizsla's intensity and exercise demands offset its trainability for anyone new to dogs.
The Vizsla edges ahead with kids, 5/5 versus the Bloodhound's 4/5, and the two tie on compatibility with other dogs at 4/5. The Bloodhound pulls ahead with strangers, though, at 4/5 against the Vizsla's 3/5 - Vizslas tend to bond intensely with their own family and can be more reserved with outsiders.
Both share risk of hip dysplasia and ear infections, but the Vizsla's list includes more serious conditions like hemangiosarcoma, lymphoma, and general cancer risk. Despite that, it lives longer on average - 10-14 years against the Bloodhound's 7-10 - a gap worth weighing alongside the specific conditions listed for each.
Cost comes out even - both breeds rate 3/5 overall, with identical monthly ranges of $100-200 and identical first-year ranges of $1,500-2,800. The deciding factor between these two is almost certainly exercise capacity and available time, not price.
Bloodhound weighs 90–110 lbs and lives 7–10 years; Vizsla weighs 45–65 lbs and lives 10–14 years. The two diverge most on trainability, exercise need and energy level. They are level on cost level, good with other dogs and good for first-time owners, so those cannot decide it. The comparison marks an easier option only where one exists. Facts like weight and country of origin are not scored. Both dogs are rated from the same dataset, which is what makes the numbers comparable with each other even though any individual dog sits somewhere inside its breed's range.
Yes, meaningfully lighter at 45-65 lbs versus 90-110 lbs, though the height difference is smaller - 21-24 inches against 23-27.
The Vizsla, rated a maximum 5/5 against the Bloodhound's 3/5 - it's a genuinely high-energy hunting breed that needs serious daily activity.
The Vizsla, rated a very low 1/5 on grooming versus the Bloodhound's 2/5, thanks to its short, sleek, low-maintenance coat.
Not really - both rate a low 2/5, though for different reasons: the Bloodhound's stubbornness versus the Vizsla's intensity and exercise demands.
It doesn't differ - both run $100-200 a month and $1,500-2,800 in the first year, with matching 3/5 overall cost ratings.
Partially - both can develop hip dysplasia and ear infections, but the Vizsla's list adds more serious risks like hemangiosarcoma and lymphoma.
The Bloodhound, at 4/5 versus the Vizsla's 3/5 - Vizslas tend to bond tightly with their own household and be more reserved with unfamiliar people.
The Vizsla, if you can meet its 5/5 exercise need - it's more trainable and lower-maintenance on grooming, but demands far more daily activity than the Bloodhound.
No difference - both run $100-200 a month and about $1,500-2,800 in year one.
The Vizsla, rated a maximum 5/5 against the Bloodhound's 3/5.
The Vizsla, typically 10-14 years compared to the Bloodhound's 7-10.






Health information here is general and is not veterinary advice. If your dog shows pain, sudden behaviour change, or worsening symptoms, consult a licensed veterinarian.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you, and we only suggest products we believe are helpful for dog owners.
Match your lifestyle to the right dog.
Take quizNot sure which breed is right for you? Take our 2-minute quiz to find out.
Take the quiz