Which is the more practical choice?
For most households, the Am Staff — lower cost, longer lifespan, and easier to manage in a smaller space. The Great Dane suits a house with room and a bigger budget.
American Staffordshire Terrier or Great Dane? On paper they differ most on apartment suitability, and on the scales Great Dane is the heavier at 110–175 lbs. Here is how the two compare on everything that shapes an ordinary week.


This is for someone already down to American Staffordshire Terrier and Great Dane and deciding between them. For this pair the decision usually turns on apartment suitability and good with other dogs, so those are covered first and in most detail. Anyone choosing from a flat has a clear answer here: American Staffordshire Terrier rates 3/5 against 1/5. It is written for the decision rather than the breed history.
Between American Staffordshire Terrier and Great Dane, apartment suitability is what separates them, and American Staffordshire Terrier is the lower-effort dog of the two to keep.
Choose American Staffordshire Terrier if you are in a flat or a smaller home, this is your first dog and the dog will be alone during the working day.
Choose Great Dane if your walking routine is modest, there are young children at home and you already have another dog.
| Feature | american staffordshire terrier | great dane | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size class | medium | giant | Equal |
| Weight | 40–70 lbs | 110–175 lbs | Equal |
| Height | 17–19 in | 28–34 in | Equal |
| Lifespan | 12–16 years | 7–10 years | american staffordshire terrier |
| Exercise need | High (4/5) | Moderate (3/5) | great dane |
| Grooming need | Very low (1/5) | Very low (1/5) | Equal |
| Shedding | Moderate (3/5) | Moderate (3/5) | Equal |
| Energy level | High (4/5) | Moderate (3/5) | Equal |
| Barking | Low (2/5) | Low (2/5) | Equal |
| Apartment suitability | Moderate (3/5) | Very low (1/5) | american staffordshire terrier |
| Good for first-time owners | Moderate (3/5) | Low (2/5) | american staffordshire terrier |
| Tolerates being alone | Moderate (3/5) | Low (2/5) | american staffordshire terrier |
| Trainability | High (4/5) | Moderate (3/5) | american staffordshire terrier |
| Good with kids | High (4/5) | Very high (5/5) | great dane |
| Good with other dogs | Low (2/5) | High (4/5) | great dane |
| Friendly to strangers | High (4/5) | Moderate (3/5) | american staffordshire terrier |
| Cost level | Moderate (3/5) | Very high (5/5) | american staffordshire terrier |
| Coat | Short, stiff and glossy | Short, smooth | Equal |
| Origin | Various | Germany | Equal |
| Typical monthly cost | $100–$200 | $200–$400 | Equal |
| Typical first-year cost | $1,400–$2,900 | $3,000–$5,000 | Equal |
This is the largest size gap in the batch. The Am Staff tops out at 70 lbs and 19 inches; the Great Dane starts at 110 lbs and reaches 175, standing 28-34 inches at the shoulder — genuinely a giant breed against a medium one. Feeding, furniture, car space, and even vet equipment all scale differently once you're talking about a dog that can look you in the eye standing on its hind legs.
Despite the size difference, the Am Staff is actually the higher-energy dog on paper — exercise need 4 out of 5 against the Great Dane's moderate 3, and energy level 4 versus 3. Great Danes are famously happy to lounge for most of the day, needing moderate rather than intense exercise. Don't mistake size for energy here; the smaller dog is the one that wants more from you daily.
Both breeds are easy keepers in the coat department — grooming rates a very low 1 out of 5 for the Am Staff and stays low for the Great Dane too, with moderate shedding (3/5) shared by both. Neither needs a groomer. The Great Dane's short coat sheds in a way that's more noticeable simply because there's more surface area to shed from.
The Am Staff manages apartment living at a moderate 3 out of 5; the Great Dane drops to a very low 1. Size is the obvious reason, but tolerance for being alone plays in too — the Great Dane rates low (2/5) against the Am Staff's moderate (3/5). Both bark rarely, so noise complaints aren't the issue; space and separation anxiety are.
The Am Staff outrates the Great Dane on trainability, 4 out of 5 against a moderate 3, and on first-time-owner suitability, 3 against 2. A giant breed that's slower to mature and physically hard to manage if undertrained raises the stakes on training — the Great Dane needs consistent early work precisely because a poorly trained 150-pound dog is a much bigger problem than a poorly trained 55-pound one.
The Great Dane rates very high with kids (5/5, against the Am Staff's already-strong 4) and high with other dogs (4/5 versus the Am Staff's low 2) — the gentle-giant reputation holds up in the numbers. The Am Staff is friendlier to strangers, 4 out of 5 against the Dane's moderate 3. Supervise young kids anyway; even a gentle 150-pound dog can knock a toddler over by accident.
The lifespan gap here is stark: 12-16 years for the Am Staff versus just 7-10 for the Great Dane, a difference typical of giant breeds. The Dane's health list is heavy and serious — bloat, dilated cardiomyopathy, wobbler syndrome, and bone cancer among ten listed conditions. Hip dysplasia and heart disease are the two overlaps with the Am Staff's shorter, lighter list.
Cost level moderate (3/5) for the Am Staff versus very high (5/5) for the Great Dane — and the dollar figures back that up hard. Monthly costs run $100-$200 versus $200-$400; first-year costs run $1,400-$2,900 versus $3,000-$5,000. Feeding a dog that can weigh 175 pounds, plus giant-breed vet care, is simply a bigger line item.
American Staffordshire Terrier weighs 40–70 lbs and lives 12–16 years; Great Dane weighs 110–175 lbs and lives 7–10 years. The two diverge most on apartment suitability, good with other dogs and cost level. They are level on barking, grooming need and shedding, so those cannot decide it. In the table, a "winner" means easier for an ordinary household — not better. Size, coat and origin are recorded without a verdict. Because both breeds are scored the same way, the gaps are reliable even where the absolute numbers are rough.
Yes — 110-175 lbs and 28-34 inches versus the Am Staff's 40-70 lbs and 17-19 inches. It's a giant breed against a medium one, not a close call.
Surprisingly, the Am Staff — 4 out of 5 versus the Great Dane's moderate 3. Danes are lower-energy than their size suggests.
The Am Staff, 3 out of 5 versus the Great Dane's 2. A giant breed's training stakes are higher because size amplifies any bad habits.
Roughly double on both counts — $200-$400 monthly versus $100-$200, and $3,000-$5,000 first-year versus $1,400-$2,900.
The Am Staff by a wide margin — 12-16 years against the Great Dane's 7-10, which is typical for giant breeds.
Hip dysplasia and heart disease appear on both lists. The Great Dane's list is longer and includes bloat and wobbler syndrome, both serious.
The Great Dane, rated high (4/5) against the Am Staff's low (2/5).
For most households, the Am Staff — lower cost, longer lifespan, and easier to manage in a smaller space. The Great Dane suits a house with room and a bigger budget.
About double: $100-$200 for the Am Staff versus $200-$400 for the Great Dane.
The Am Staff, 4 out of 5 against the Great Dane's moderate 3 — size doesn't track with activity level here.
Considerably — 7-10 years versus the Am Staff's 12-16, a difference worth sitting with before committing to a giant breed.






Health information here is general and is not veterinary advice. If your dog shows pain, sudden behaviour change, or worsening symptoms, consult a licensed veterinarian.
Some links on this site are affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you, and we only suggest products we believe are helpful for dog owners.
Match your lifestyle to the right dog.
Take quizNot sure which breed is right for you? Take our 2-minute quiz to find out.
Take the quiz